Misunderstood Marketing - : Why AI in Marketing is Harder Than It Looks

The Invisible Cost of Visibility: Why Intel Faded Away

There was a time when I wouldn't buy a computer unless it had the sticker. " Intel Inside " was not just a slogan; it was a piece of marketing genius that changed the balance of power in the tech industry. It was an ingredient branding masterclass. They managed to make the average consumer care passionately about a component they would never see, touch, or fully understand. I remember hunting for the " Intel Core i7 " logo. I had a bad experience with an AMD laptop more than a decade ago, and that solidified my loyalty. Intel was the safety net. The brand was the guarantee of performance. The Shift to Commodity But somewhere along the line, the equation changed. Laptops became commodities. My purchasing criteria shifted. I stopped looking for the blue sticker and started looking at the utility. I stuck with Lenovo —even after it was no longer US-owned—because the form factor worked. I stopped caring about the processor generation and started scrutinizing the ...

If you spend five minutes on LinkedIn, you would be forgiven for thinking that AI has already solved marketing. The narrative is seductive: type a prompt, get a campaign, watch the revenue roll in.

As a Principal Research Director who talks to enterprise leaders every week, I can tell you the reality is different. Generating text is easy. Generating value is remarkably hard.

We are currently in the "trough of disillusionment" for many marketing teams. They have bought the tools, but they haven't seen the transformation. Here is why the gap exists—and how to close it.

The "Magic Button" Fallacy

The misunderstanding starts with the definition of the tool. Most marketers treat AI as a creator—a magic button to bypass the work.

But AI is not a creator; it is a processor. It requires inputs. If your strategy is vague, your brand voice is undocumented, and your customer data is siloed, AI will simply scale your confusion.

Uncommon Knowledge: AI doesn't solve a lack of strategy; it exposes it. If you cannot articulate your value proposition clearly to a human, you certainly cannot prompt an LLM to do it for you.

The Hidden Friction of "Good Enough"

The standard for enterprise marketing is not "passable." It is "precise."

When a CMO asks for a thought leadership piece, they are looking for a specific nuance that aligns with the company’s risk profile and strategic goals. AI models are designed to predict the next likely word, which inevitably pushes content toward the average—the "mean."

For a generic SEO post, the "mean" is fine. For a brand trying to differentiate itself, the "mean" is death.

The hidden friction—and the hidden cost—is the human time required to take "good enough" AI output and refine it into something distinct. Often, this editing process takes longer than drafting from scratch.

Operationalizing vs. Playing

The difference between a team playing with AI and a team driving business value with AI comes down to Governance and Ops.

Governance: Who owns the prompt library? Who checks the facts? Who ensures the data doesn't leak?

Ops: How does the AI output flow into your CRM? Is it structured data or just text?

The Business Value

So, why bother? Because once you get past the hype and do the hard work of integration, the benefits are real.

Speed to Insight: AI is poor at writing strategy, but it is excellent at summarizing customer sentiment from thousands of support tickets.

Scale of Personalization: We can finally move from segment-based marketing to individual-based marketing, provided the underlying data schema is clean.

AI in marketing is not a shortcut. It is a lever. It multiplies force, but you still have to apply the pressure.

Featured Post

The Invisible Cost of Visibility: Why Intel Faded Away

Why AI in Marketing is Harder Than It Looks